How much extra overhead for ASP.NET Core vs .NET Core?
I'm in the process of building some .NET Core based processes that will be running on several EC2 instances on AWS. Initially the thought was to just use a long running console app. But I started thinking it might be helpful to expose some Web API stuff so I can do stuff more easily remotely instead of locally on each box.
But I was concerned about how much extra CPU and Ram would be utilized by self hosting ASP.NET with Kestrel. I'm also curious if beyond an actual call to a Web API, would a process running as async task even be using Kestrel and/or any added bloat of ASP.NET itself?
0 comments:
Post a Comment